Dare to push the envelope, to taste the forbidden fruit,
to cast aside the shackles of political correctness,
to stop and smell the roses, to bloviate to your heart's content --
to venture even (gasp)

BEYOND RHETORIC!




Occasional commentaries by over-the-hill-but-still-prolific politically-reactive, independent-thinking, sexagenarian poker-playing buds 'n buddettes ....


The Over-the-Hill Gang


REMEMBER


VICTORY CAUCUS COALITION






Thanks, Mitt. We who supported you will continue to count on you to work for the America you love. God Speed.


<< November 2009 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed



6/10/2007
...About That Internet Debris ....

No wonder it's getting more and more difficult to surf safely.  Thanks for the clarification, BB.

TimesDaily.com has an interesting article that says cyberspace is becoming littered with dead blogs.

Dead blogs litter the Internet like squashed bugs on a windscreen during a warm Southern evening. Since their christening in 1999, millions of people like Haddock have dabbled with blogs only to abandon them after a few months.

"I think a lot of people started blogs because they got excited; the hype was there, but they really didn't have a purpose," said futurist Jim Carroll, whose clients include the Walt Disney Corp., Nestle and the BBC. "There's only so much you can read about somebody else's life before you get bored with it," he said.

The blog rush has slowed down from 175,000 new blogs posted per day in July 2006 to 120,000 new blogs per day as of March, according to Technorati, a blog tracking company.

Blogs with staying power, Endgaget's techno-blog and Boing Boing's curios-blog, stick around because they have a direct purpose, Carroll says. That, plus paid staff and advertising dollars.

120,000 new blogs per day is still impressive but there is no denying that there are lots of dead blogs out there and there is no denying the number of new blogs per day is starting to slow. However, there are always going to be new bloggers just like there have always been new writers.

What's also being overlooked is that other forms of social media are continuing to grow rapidly. Social network profiles and microblogging tools are replacing personal blogs for some. Everything always comes back to the definition of what a blog is. It seems like profiles and microblogs are being excluded from the definition of a blog but it isn't crystal clear.

What's clear is that professional blogging has emerged as a new medium that is rapidly being adapted by the mainstream media. Online media companies are using blogs as a way to provide information and grow traffic online. Newspapers still seem to be launching new blogs daily. At the same time popular online blogs have been expanding into networks and hiring more bloggers so they are even more competitive with established media outlets. The number of professional blogs will probably continue to grow even as the overall blog growth rate slows. Media companies and bloggers recognize that the format is one that works very well online. It also helps that readers appreciate the layout and structure of blogs.

Citing a Gartner study the TimesDaily.com article says that eventually "200 million people call themselves ex-bloggers." That's a ton of dead blogs but it won't matter to most blog readers. Many readers may never even notice the dead blogs because sites like Digg will guide them to new sources. Search engines like Technorati will show them the new content from active blogs first. Readers will just move on to the blogs that are continuing to publish new content and new information. People will continue to want to find out what's new and that's just what bloggers will continue to provide.

Wonder how the danger of traveling thru the Internet compares with, say .... the odds of encountering debris in space travel or an impaired celebrity driving on a California freeway? 

I always thought of net debris as porn -- not defunct blogs. 

Move along, folks.  Nothing to see here.

 

 


Posted at 8:47 pm by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

6/3/2007
Jack's Drug House

More Murtha muck:

It's about time dems lived up to their campaign promises.

 


Posted at 5:25 pm by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

5/20/2007
Immigration Reform Redux

What is it?  A twenty-year cycle? 

McCain and Ted Kennedy tried to reform the immigration system last year.  They failed.  Their project became the basis of what the Senate will begin debating tomorrow.  Only this time, it was the President who joined Kennedy in crafting what they labeled a "bipartisan" reform bill.

What's at stake?  If it passes in its original form, George Bush and the GOP will get their guest-worker program with Mexico's "approval" while dems get "credit" for amnesty from a new and appreciative voter group. Oh, yeah -- Bush conceded repayment of back taxes. 

The only legitimate conservative presidential contender who opposes the current reform bill is Mitt Romney.  This issue alone may carry him to the top of the ticket for the remainder of the year.  McCain favors the bill; so does Rudy.  Both non-contenders Fred! and Newt supported reforms in their former stints in Congress. 

Over-the-Hill bloggers have called for defeat of the existing bill unanimously.  Gull offers a few "acceptable" options.  Humbug is not a happy camper.  Rhet suggests back-taxes be "forgiven" for everyone.  Whim sees the current scenario as a boon for Mitt Romney.  Rev calls McCain, Rudy and the two non-contenders to task.  Mydawg distinguishes myths, from facts and mythical facts ....

And we (the O-t-H group) are but small apples in the blogosphere fruitbowl.  The top bananas are critical to mixing this stuff up and organizing a defeat for this bill.


 


Posted at 9:33 pm by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

5/13/2007
Was Tornado Response Politicized?

Did Howard Dean and the Democrat leadership instruct the Kansas Governor to deliberately LIE about federal response to aid tornado victims?

If this IS true ------------------ these self-serving politicos need to be revealed and removed from office immediately.

CREDIT:  Perish the Thought

Did DNC Tell Kansas Gov. to Lie?

FLASHBACK to Katrina and claims that federal authorities failed to respond appropriately ..... Why DID local authorities NOT ask for immediate federal assistance?  Were the LA governor and New Orleans mayor taking cues from the DNC in a(nother) attempt to sacrifice human lives in order to discredit George Bush?

This blogger (who, coincidentally lost two friends in that tragedy) believes that BDS and the blind-hatred of George Bush are far stronger motivations than any regard for the lives and safety of the American people. 

Why did Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius subsequently withdraw her charge(s) that critical National Guard equipment had been sent to Iraq? 

This is a radio interview of the breaking story from Hannity Radio.

Check out the ONLINE trail of posts, letter from a DNC attorney to FreePress and the radio station, and comments from PowerLine blog.

From a FreePress post:

I was listening to the Quinn & Rose show this morning on XM radio when Host, Jim Quinn told his audience that Howard Dean called Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius early, around 5 am, one morning after the tornado had destroyed the town of Greensburg, Kansas and discussed with her what to say about the tornado and how to blame the war in Iraq and the Bush administration on a slow response to the aftermath.

He also said that she, Gov. Sebelius, called Senator Sam Brownback's office only to learn he wasn't there but then called him on his cell phone and reached him while he was in his car were she confessed to him that she had been instructed by her party leadership, (more specifically, Howard Dean) on how to politicize the tornado's destruction of Greensburg and attack the White House and the Iraq war for a seemingly slow response. She reassured the Senator that her allegations didn't blame him or Pat Roberts, also a Kansas Senator, for the lack of immediate response.

That would explain her public statements to the press that proved later to be untrue. She made statements to the effect that the Iraq war and the deployment of the national guard units to Iraq from her state has left Kansas without the equipment and man power needed to respond more quickly to the tornado's aftermath. This all turns out to be false and the governor herself has back tracked on her own claims.

Mr. Quinn also revealed that she confessed to Brownback that she couldn't pass up such an opportunity like this to attack the President whose approval ratings, in this hostile political climate, is so low.

These revelations are startling and if true should call into question the governors competence and her judgment. Quinn adamantly stressed that his source, who he didn't name because he was sure it would jeopardize his job, was extremely reliable and in a position that would give him direct knowledge of these revelations.

From the DNC letter to FreePress:

The statements quoted above are false and defamatory, are libelous and slanderous, and clearly threaten to interfere with the DNC's operations and ability to solicit support and raise funds by prejudicing the organization in the the eyes of Democratic Party supporters and the public. For these reasons, we demand that FreeRepublic.com (i) immediately cease and desist from further dissemination of the above-quoted statements or any statements similar in substance and (ii) immediately post a retraction of these statements in a location on its web page at least as prominent as that on which the original story appeared.
Please let us know by noon tomorrow (May 11, 2007) whether you intend to comply with these requests.


 A PowerLine attorney responds:

The attorney who sent the letter on behalf of the DNC is attorney Joseph Sandler, representing the Democratic National Committee. In my view, Sandler is a thug representing a bunch of reprobates and bullies. Here's why.

Under the First Amendment, as construed by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. Sullivan, citizens are protected from defamation claim by public figures so long as the statements in issue are lacking in "actual malice," i.e, knowledge of their falsehood or reckless disregard as to whether they are false or not.

Accordingly, our reader's Free Republic post based on the statements of Jim Quinn is constitutionally immune from a defamation claim. Whether Quinn and those who broadcast his program have such immunity is a different question, but the same constitutional protection applies to them. Professor and First Amendment expert Eugene Volokh coincidentally makes a closely related point based on the Sullivan case today.

"Actual malice" is a tough standard for public figures to overcome. That's why defamation claims by public figures have essentially disappeared since the Sullivan case. Under the Sullivan case, the First Amendment affords wide latitude for the discussion of public figures as well as issues of public concern.

Sandler's letter to Free Republic incorporates no element of "actual malice." It is couched in the traditional common law of defamation that the Supreme Court killed for public figures in the Sullivan case. Sandler's letter carries Governor Dean's denial of Quinn's assertions, but it does not even allege that Jim Quinn had knowledge of the statements' falsity or made them with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity.

We therefore associate ourselves with our reader's statements regarding Governor Dean and invite Mr. Sandler to sue us for defamation as he threatens to sue Free Republic. This is to put him and his client on notice, however, that we intend to seek our attorney's fees under federal law for the assertion of a frivolous claim if he does so.

I have minimal legal background, but wholeheartedly concur.  No entity -- especially Howard Dean and the DNC -- has the right to control the blogosphere.  So sue us, too.  Sue every blogger who dares to exercise their right to speak. 

Maybe Brownback will be asked to comment about this during the debate on Thursday.   He should be.

Maybe it is also time to revisit the Katrina tragedy -- with a review of actual cell phone and email records from the DNC to LA.

 


Posted at 11:14 am by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

5/5/2007
Say No, Fred. Say No.

Gull started me thinking about this.  Fred Thompson has too much baggage from his own political career to be President. 

With his affiliation with Hillary Clinton (all negative), I can only imagine what a national campaign will look like.  I don't want to re-live the Whitewater investigation or the finance irregularities associated with the Clinton administration.  I don't want to have Filegate revived as a national issue. 

I'm sick and tired of the Clintons and the black spot they left on the White House.

Please, Fred.  Say no.

 


Posted at 2:46 pm by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

4/29/2007
The Bottom Line: Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney.  Can't wait for the debates on Thursday.  No one has said it better than Gull at Perish the Thought

We need Mitt Romney as President. 

If I could add categories to my blog, they would read Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney!!

 


Posted at 3:43 pm by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

4/27/2007
Response to Reid


Posted at 9:38 pm by WizardofAhhhs
Comment (1)  

4/25/2007
Lieberman for Senate Majority Leader!

Switch to the Republican Caucus, Joe.

America and our troops need your leadership and insight.  We need the "balance" you can bring to the debate on the War Against Terror. 

Now, Joe. 

Now more than ever.

credit:  Perish the Thought

 

 


Posted at 10:51 pm by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

4/22/2007
Standing with the Hokie Nation

Stand tall, Hokie Nation.

Our hearts and spirits stand with you!

 


Posted at 1:07 pm by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

4/15/2007
I HAVE SINNED.

  It's only Sunday morning and already twice today -- twice, count'em -- I have sinned. 

I hugged  two humans with whom I have only passing familiarity and absolutely no marital bond(s).   And I've hugged my favorite 4-legged critter once.  (Hubby only got a nudge to turn over and stop snoring.) 

So stone me.  Tie me to a post in the village square and lash me with a wet noodle.  Heap burning coals on my head. 

Just deliver me from living among clerics such as those who have condemned Pakistani Tourism Minister Nilofar Bakhtiar for hugging her parachute instructor. 

Hell -- if a stranger helped me land safely after throwing myself out of an airplane, I'd kiss him smack-dab where he spits. 

 

 


Posted at 9:36 am by WizardofAhhhs
Make a comment  

Previous Page Next Page